In Mud Matters! I look at the way mud, as a remainder of a flood, engages with the ecological, public and private domain and unravel long-term consequences on the bodily, material, environmental and emotional level. I must find a way to let this matter ‘speak’. Not as easy as it sounds because how do you work with substance that has no human voice? This task is particularly challenging given that my research takes place years after the flood, making it difficult to locate and study mud directly.
A way to let mud speak is via people affected. I visit their homes where the event happened, and we talk “through” their dwellings. Walking through people’s houses and them showing me the traces and places of the event, the so-called visible and invisible watermarks (Ullberg 2013) are pointed out. This gives a good idea of the damage that has been repaired or was still (or again) visible. I also use visual elicitation techniques where photos and films taken by people on their mobile phones during the event are used to talk about the flood. These personal materials allow people to reflect on and discuss the event in a more visceral way.
To gain insights into the way nature is affected I conducted transect walks with biologists, ecologist and other experts. The aim of these walks is to chart together the visible and less visible transformations that the flood, and mud more specifically, left behind, including nature’s response to these transformations.
These are just a few examples of the methods I’m employing in this research. As the study progresses, I’ll be adding new approaches, such as participant observation, to deepen my understanding.